journals

Just For The Record

By Liam, October 20, 2008

Since over the years it has become increasingly clear that Apple’s developers cannot for the life of them write Windows applications with any sort of the attention to detail for which they are known, and since it is also an arduous task to educate those who have not personally experienced the cavalcade of mediocrity that is anything made by Apple with the extension .exe, I want to array out just how oddly inconsistent and sometimes frustrating these applications are. Rather than start right in with the evisceration, however, I want to go over the sole Apple application that actually took Being a Windows Application 1-2: Software Update, for some mysterious reason.

Apple Software Update

Ignoring the obvious aberration that under no circumstances should bug fixes necessitate a 75MB download, Software Update by and large is the best application of the four. It’s consistent with the visual theme of the system rather than foisting it’s own look upon everyone, it (mostly) uses Windows design conventions (except for one big one: Tools>Options is the preferred way, not Edit>Preferences. An entire menu in the menubar could have been eliminated by following this simple paradigm.)

Uploaded Image

Quicktime

I’ll start with the most mature application of the group, and by mature I mean senile. Remember when Apple thought so highly of encasing every product they made in brushed aluminum that they got half way through their software library before realizing robovomit isn’t attractive? Quicktime is a monument to that bygone age. It’s also a monument to the…
(Continue)


Liam's Avatar 8 4271
Liam Liam's Profile comments views

Back to top

NY Times: Microsoft walks away from Yahoo bid

By Nick, May 3, 2008

Well, there you go.

The New York Times reports that after months of wrangling, Microsoft has walked away from its attempt to purchase Yahoo.1 The reason? Microsoft and Yahoo couldn’t come to terms on a price, so instead of launching a long and difficult proxy fight, Microsoft decided to give up on its takeover bid. You can read the details here.

Personally I think this was a good idea on Microsoft’s part. For one, the Yahoo takeover was becoming a bit of a distraction at a time when Microsoft has larger fish to fry (like convincing the world that Windows Vista doesn’t suck). For another, I still have a hard time how a Microsoft-Yahoo merger makes sense. Sure, Yahoo’s more popular than MSN and Windows Live, but Yahoo is still far, far behind Google, and with some exceptions, hasn’t been particularly innovative in recent years. What Microsoft needs is innovation to keep up with Google. Yahoo wouldn’t have brought it. And then you have the messy issue of trying to blend the two companies. Will it blend? Probably not. My guess is that Yahoo would have survived as a Microsoft subsidiary.

Where do Yahoo and Microsoft go from here? In the months since Microsoft made its initial bid, there have been rumors of Yahoo forming an alliance with another company (News Corp. and AOL). Meanwhile, Microsoft has to find some way to compete with Google being that it looks like which OS you use is becoming less important, giving people an…
(Continue)


Nick 9 2928
Nick Nick's Profile comments views

Back to top

EXCLUSIVE: Microsoft moves up Windows 7 release date

By Nick, April 1, 2008

Deep Thought has received word from an anonymous source that Microsoft is set to release Windows 7...next month. The reason? People just don’t like Vista. Our source sent us an excerpt from an internal memo:

TO: All Microsoft Employees
FROM: Steve Ballmer
RE: Windows 7

Dear team,
We have decided to move up the Windows 7 release date to sometime next month. The Windows development team has been working around the clock to get Windows 7—which will be branded as Windows the Magnificent --ready years ahead of schedule. In fact, we have had a secret team working on Windows 7 since before Vista’s development concluded. We were hoping to release it at a later date, but unfortunately Vista was such a commercial failure that we couldn’t wait any longer and had to move up Windows 7 by a little bit.

More information will be forthcoming in the coming days.

What does this mean for Microsoft? “They have learned how to listen to their customers, without a doubt,” noted analyst A.P. Rulfulse from the firm Lawson, Mayer, Aldridge, and Owens, LLC.  “It’s unfortunate for Microsoft that Vista was such a miserable failure, but I believe they learned their lesson. Moving up the Windows 7—the Magnificent—release shows that Microsoft is still a dynamic force in today’s tech economy.”

“Microsoft followers who saw Vista’s reign as a reign of terror will be pleased by this development.” said George Otcha of Ronald-Otcha Technology Forecasting. “The jury is still out on Windows the Magnificent, of course,…
(Continue)


Nick 2 4068
Nick Nick's Profile comments views

Back to top

Windows Vista SP1 Released

By Liam, March 18, 2008

Uploaded Image

It’s coming...

Uploaded Image
It’s here. Impressions if it works; ranting if it doesn’t.

Thoughts

I didn’t really pay attention to my PC while SP1 installed, but it couldn’t have taken more than half an hour to complete. It was installed like any other update, with downloading and preliminary installing occurring in a Windows Update window. Then it rebooted the PC and finished up before letting me log in. The only problem I’ve had so far occurred when I got to my PC after it was finished. The screen seemed compressed; it was the result of my display resolution on my primary monitor being changed from 1280x1024 to 1280x768. I haven’t noticed much of a responsiveness increase, though I never had an issue with the responsiveness of Vista.

Microsoft has published an article on TechCenter that is the be-all end-all of SP1 information pages. This page is long, but does contain some useful information. The most notable change to me is the removal of the Search item in the Start Menu’s right pane, which I used every once in a while (thanks Google :rolleyes: ) I don’t have the means to test it, but apparently network file transfer speeds have improved.

In the end, SP1 is a decent update to Vista, and marks the point at which Vista begins to be a proven technology. I expect many businesses will begin to consider Vista in future rollouts. Whether it will speed Vista’s adoption in the consumer market remains to be seen, though most consumers…
(Continue)


Liam's Avatar 0 2594
Liam Liam's Profile comments views

Back to top

Microsoft Makes Standards Mode Default for IE8

By Liam, March 3, 2008

Uploaded Image

Microsoft today announced that, contrary to earlier plans, Internet Explorer 8 would default to its most standards compliant rendering mode. Early reports from the company’s Internet Explorer team stated that IE8 would default to a rendering mode identical to the standards support of IE7, with support for a meta tag placed in the header of the web’s source that could switch standards mode on. Now, plans have been reversed, with the engine’s most standards complient mode on for all web pages, and legacy support available for those who wish to avoid having to troubleshoot bugs that may appear in standards mode.

This decision appears to have been made in accordance with recently published Interoperability Principles from the company, in a push to become more standards friendly (see section II.) According to Internet Explorer’s General Manager Dean Hachamovitch,

Microsoft recently published a set of Interoperability Principles. Thinking about IE8’s behavior with these principles in mind, interpreting web content in the most standards compliant way possible is a better thing to do.

A public beta of Internet Explorer 8 is expected to be released later this month.

Can’t get enough of…
(Continue)


Liam's Avatar 1 2736
Liam Liam's Profile comment views

Back to top

Page 2 of 27 pages  1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next >  Last »

more stuff

Page 1 of 6 pages
 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next >  Last »