journal:

WWDC 2006

Anyone Got Any App Ideas?

The Mail part of the keynote was dull enough to have me wishing Roz Ho was on the stage for some reason

Anyone got any spare app ideas? It’s just Apple kinda took out the market I was planning to enter. I’m now left with a half finished back up app and a jaw on the ground saying “Time Machine looks FREAKING AWESOME!!”. I thought that I’d feel some regret, some anger at Apple if they ever crushed an application of mine, but I think they’ve stunned me with how far ahead Time Machine is to any back up app on the Mac.

So… what about the rest of Leopard? iChat looks very nice, especially the screen sharing. The others are great novelties, though the collaboration looks amazing. Spaces looks like the slickest virtual desktop implementation I’ve seen in a long time and Core Animation also seems to blow away Core Image and Video in terms of coolness. The Mail part of the keynote was dull enough to have me wishing Roz Ho was on the stage for some reason, but besides that there were some pleasant confirmations in terms of Dashboard and Spotlight

There are also some significant points here too. We have Leopard’s shipping time, Spring 2007, which could be around the same time Vista comes out if it is delayed again. We also have what could be a tabbed IM system that doesn’t look like it’s a seriously flawed concept, though I could be wrong, I’d have to use it. But this seems to be Apple saying to Microsoft, we’ll take everything you might have beat us at with Vista and throw it away. The collaboration in iChat fixes the biggest hole between Vista and OS X, but also other things, such as Core Animation and Time Machine. They are showing that Apple is seeing where Vista looked better and making sure they top it. It is also quite interesting that these are all they are showing of Leopard for now.

Now onto the hardware. The Mac Pro is amazing. It is powerful, has great upgrade options thanks to it’s greater expandability and it is cheap. When you consider that the pervious 2.3GHz G5 PowerMac cost £1749 and that the new Mac Pro ships in it’s standard configuration for just £1699 and it features more RAM, better graphics and twice the processing cores it shows Apple is serious about price, these are extremely competitive systems. It also helps that the displays have dropped in price, however I didn’t get my hope for a set of budget iMac style displays

Which leads us on to, what is left. Well, we have the fabled iPhone and true video iPod, both of which were merely just hopes for WWDC, especially as the big mid year consumer event is next month. There is also no mention of updates to the Finder or Safari, but those could come at a later date. Many people were hoping for Core 2 based MacBook Pro’s, however given their last update was when the MacBook was release I doubted they’d receive another. The most likely candidate for a Core 2 chip is the iMac, which has had no speed bump since it first moved to Intel back in January.

This keynote will leave many disappointed as their longing for consumer goods made them forget that this the event where updates to pro machines happen, not a mid year MWSF. The closest to that is MacExpo Paris, which was where the iMac G5 was announced nearly 2 years ago. However I am extremely excited by what I have seen, it shows the future of the Mac, lower competitive prices, getting rid of the expensive stigma and blowing the minds of those looking at Vista. The only bad thing is knowing that my past few months of coding has gone to waste… oh well, back to the drawing board.


« Previous · · Next »

thinkback

1.

Overall Leopard was kinda disappointing IMO.  Not because the features weren’t solid additions but because they have those Vista 2.0 banners and they really didn’t do anything worth of that.  they also talked a lot of stuff about Microsoft copying them then they went and copied MS.

Other than interface, Time Machine is Previous Docs, vista backup, and vista system restore (which is different from the XP version).

Dashboard now has the ability to clip web pages like Active Desktop.

Mail and iCal got some features from Outlook and Windows Live.

iChat got the collaboration and sharing features from Windows Messenger (XP in 2001) and windows collaboration in Vista.

Spotlight got the networked search that MS already put in WDS, Indexing Server (XP/2000/2003) and Vista/longhorn.

Spaces is virtual desktops… looks like Nview (nvidia), Hydravision (ATI), or the MS Powertoy.

Core animation is their answer to Avalon’s animation capabilities.

I just expected more…
VOIP, virtualization, new finder etc.  especially if they are trying to pull that “Vista 2.0” stuff.

-----------
I am really surprised at the 64-bit release though.  not so much that they did 64-bit but that it’s one OS that works with all your old drivers and that’s really impressive.  I wonder if they just recompiled all the drivers for 64-bit?

Is the kernel 32-bit or 64-bit?  A 64-bit kernel/userspace with 32 bit compatibilty is what MS does but I was told a 32-bit kernel with 64-bit extensions was not possible on X86
(that’s what I was told by the Suse and Gentoo folks ).

2.

The kernel has been 64 bit since Tiger, they’re adding 64 bit UI in Leopard. You do have to remember that there is stuff that they aren’t showing off, which I’m assuming is going to be better than the likes of Time Machine and Core Animation.

3.

Who knows what they’re going to show off.  The idea that Microsoft might copy it to stick it in Vista is “disingenious” as Mac Fan would put it.  Vista is nearly at release canidate stage.  I think they have somethings they are working on but aren’t sure if they’ll make the final release.  For instance, they might be in heavy negotiations for a movie rental service or something like that.

4.

The other consideration is that they just didn’t have enough material for a demo. If they are big features then they’re going to want a big demo which you can’t do with a half finished piece of code. However I doubt a movie rental service would be one of the features, as that is more likely to be in iTunes.

5.

I’m reserving judgement on Time Machine. It’s looks like it may be useful for my home machine laptop but is it going to be any use in my office? Doesn’t look like it.

As for any other app ideas. I would have said a WYSIWYG Wiki for our intranet, but it looks like Apple have come to the party on that one too:
http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/leopard/ wikiserver.html

6.

I’ve been on and off all day as to whether carry on with my back up application. I mean in a way it would be better that Time Machine by allowing for back ups to CDs etc rather than requiring a hard disk, but the problem is the integration. In the end I’ve figured out a really good reason for stopping development, and that’s that I’d probably end up using Time Machine for backing up myself. I just hope you can use the same hard disk for backing up several computers.

7.

No, the kernel has always been 32-bit on Darwin/PowerPC, even on the 64-bit PowerPC 970. This is yet another advantage PowerPC has over Intel; it’s able to run 64-bit applications with a 32-bit kernel in ring 0.

Page 1 of 1 pages

respond

Have an account? Log in to leave your comments!

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.