I think blog entries are what I feel at the moment and quantity is as good as anything, at least in my opinion but since I am part of a larger community, perhaps of non-anarchists, I must expand my thought rather than close the thought thread/post.

Why is it that anarchists are considered anti-social?  Of course they are by definition but not really.  They like to have no authorities but this means there’s no reason you can’t make your authority system and follow it if you can manage to do so without state-backing.  The fucking problem is coercion by force.  Slavery.  Rape.  Rape less so but definitely murder.

Blackmail is not something we need to regulate ideally.  Nor are drugs and that’s a presently curable fix to delete the laws and let druggies be normal people again.  Coca Cola style.  Like the original cocoa[ine] drink!

I could complain more about how I have to fill up this post but I want to and I like talking as much as possible.  I both found my latest class this morning (yes I went and importantly was up and had a choice).  The class was found to be pleasurable and satisfying.  Not emotionally satisfying but intellectually.  I grok satisfaction.  I grokked it today at Soc 105.

But I realized I’m still holding back.  I’m just so intellectually satisfied that nothing can down me.  Probably.  But the idea I"m holding back is disruptive at times.  Distracting.  DIsappointing.  In an anarchist world or at least a LibT (libertarian) couldn’t I talk more easily since I had no pressure to stay, legally, in any situation.  No legal force against me.  Unless I killed someone.  But anarchists allow that.  Except for the example of states spontaneously being created in an anarchist system that’s purposely setup to start as anarchist.  It will still be anarchist no matter what.  That’s for sure.  But it’s not as fun if you h ave no land to be an anarchist on because the countries that form are using force to patrol their property.  What they claim is their property.

Seriously, it’s elegantly simple.  Live happy.  Be an anarchist.  Don’t kill me but do whatever you want.  Isn’t that weird to consider?  Total freedom and no judgment for yourself, no matter what THE FUCK you are doing.  Evil or good is non-existent.  Nihilistic?  Existentialist?  No free will?  These terms are meaningless.

All there is what you choose to do and that comes from what you are aware enough of to control and be self-aware about.

I love knowledge and self-knowledge most.  I love persoanlity types for this reason.  It’s power.

Power is good in my opinion. 

Wildness is too.

PURE wild pleasure and stress and everything in between.

Wildness.

How does an anarchist raise their children?  Guy or girl, child girl or guy, it is infinite possibilities.  They could train them as assassins or peace-bringers. 

Personally...what a word...personally.  I think of this great utopia.  People need to chose to enter it.  It is real then in my eyes.  My mind shuns anything forced upon it.  I am cautious and mis-trusting at first, if not smart to be careful like anyone else.

But when I don’t get a chance to analyze what I am going into or worse yet I’m already in it.  That’s hell.

My child will not experience that.  They indeed will be lead until a certain age and if I can help it beyond that.  The age is theres to choose.  But 18 is a point they win anyway and grow out of me.  BUT i want them to succeed sooner so I can live out the dream…

The dream of equality between parent and child.